<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>RUDAR Community:</title>
    <link>http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/1618</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:42:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-22T20:42:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A University Mainly in Esperanto</title>
      <link>http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/6667</link>
      <description>Title: A University Mainly in Esperanto
Authors: Gobbo, Federico; Fössmeier, Reinhard
Description: Power Point presentation for paper presented by the authors at the international conference "CALPIU'08: Transnational student mobility" hosted by CALPIU/Roskilde University.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 07:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/6667</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-07-15T07:18:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Megaproject policy and planning: problems causes, cures</title>
      <link>http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2727</link>
      <description>Title: Megaproject policy and planning: problems causes, cures
Authors: Flyvbjerg, Bent
Abstract: This paper focuses on problems in megaproject policy and planning and their causes and&#xD;
possible cures. After considerations of methodology, the paper first identifies as a main&#xD;
problem in megaproject development pervasive misinformation about the costs, benefits,&#xD;
and risks involved. A consequence of misinformation is cost overruns, benefit shortfalls,&#xD;
and waste. Second, the paper explores the causes of misinformation and finds that political-&#xD;
economic explanations best account for the available evidence: planners and promoters&#xD;
deliberately misrepresent costs, benefits, and risks in order to increase the likelihood&#xD;
that it is their projects, and not the competition's, that gain approval and funding. This&#xD;
results in the "survival of the unfittest," where often it is not the best projects that are&#xD;
built, but the most misrepresented ones. Finally, the paper presents measures for&#xD;
reforming megaproject policy and planning with a focus on better planning methods and&#xD;
improved governance structures, the latter being more important.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2727</guid>
      <dc:date>2007-02-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>In defence of enmity - critiques of liberal globalism</title>
      <link>http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2068</link>
      <description>Title: In defence of enmity - critiques of liberal globalism
Authors: Thorup, Mikkel</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2068</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kassation af biografier m.v. på Roskilde Universitetsbibliotek</title>
      <link>http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2049</link>
      <description>Title: Kassation af biografier m.v. på Roskilde Universitetsbibliotek
Authors: Jørgensen, Lars
Abstract: Denne opgave har søgt at afprøve Stanley J. Slotes metode til udpegning af kassations-kandidater indenfor en delsamling på Roskilde Universitetsbibliotek. Metoden består i at isolere ubenyttet materiale fra bestanden på baggrund af et objektivt kriterium: Udlånsda-toen. Dataindsamlingen er blevet foretaget så vidt muligt efter de metodiske anvisninger. Kravet om fuld statistisk repræsentativitet har dog ikke kunnet opfyldes, hvorfor resulta-terne må betragtes med varsomhed. Det vurderes dog, at undersøgelsen som en art pilot-projekt har kunnet vise, at en udtynding af bestanden i delsamlingen breve, dagbøger, (selv)biografier, og memoirer (UDK-tal 929A/Z.*) ville kunne ske ved udtage dokumen-ter, som ikke har været udlånt siden april 2001, til efterfølgende subjektiv vurdering med henblik på kassation. Dette ville berøre max. 2,6 pct. af udlånet. Lægges skæringspunktet derimod et år senere (april 2002) vil det berøre max. 6,2 pct. af udlånet. Beslutningen herom må primært bero på, om der er tale om akut eller nærtforestående pladsbehov.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/2049</guid>
      <dc:date>2006-04-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

