Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://rudar.ruc.dk/handle/1800/5346
|
| Title: | Alkoholreklameetik - et forburdsspørgsmål |
| Authors: | Nielsen, Rasmus Held-Hansen, Anias Malchow-Møller, Jakob Freud-Magnus, Troels Jehrbo, Simon Scherfig, Valentin |
| Advisor: | Søbirk Petersen, Thomas |
| Keywords: | alcohol advertising ethics argumentation |
| Examination Date: | 25-Jun-2010 |
| Issue Date: | 24-Jun-2010 |
| Abstract: | This study is a critical analysis of the central arguments in the debate concerning the alcohol advertising law. Seen from a utilitarianistic point of view, the different prevalent arguments in the debate will be analyzed and assessed. There are three main groupings of arguments; the health related, the economical related and the arguments related to freedom of speech. The arguments are analyzed in accordance with existing theory of argumentation, so that they may be deconstructed and juxtaposed, to clarify which opinions exist in the current debate. The general purpose of the study is to give the reader the necessary knowledge to take a stand in the ethical question, on whether we should induce a ban on alcohol advertising. The study concludes that a ban on alcohol advertising would be the desirable initiative, in accordance to the argument analysis, which indicates that this would be the ethically correct solution. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1800/5346 |
| Subject: | Thesis |
| Education: | Humanistisk teknologisk basisstudium basisrapporter / Basic Studies in Technological Humanities |
| Appears in Collections: | Humanistisk teknologisk basisstudium basisrapporter
|
This item is protected by original copyright
|
Items in RUDAR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|